The impacts of enforcing Rights of Nature through jurisdictional guarantees in Ecuador
Article Sidebar
Published:
Jan 22, 2022
Main Article Content
Abstract
The constitutional guarantees mostly used to implement the Rights of Nature in Ecuador have been the jurisdictional guarantees, which in essence represent a sanctioning style of implementation. Most studies analyse the quantitative impacts when executing these mechanisms – number of sentences. This journal article analyses the quality of the jurisdictional mechanisms and the effectiveness of their results. Concluding in a learning framework that evidence the lack of preventive environmental policies pro nature.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
How to Cite
Salazar Gómez, L. (2022). The impacts of enforcing Rights of Nature through jurisdictional guarantees in Ecuador. Revista Ruptura, 3(03), 24. https://doi.org/10.26807/rr.v3i03.102
Section
Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Ávila, R. (2016). El Neo constitucionalismo Andino. Ecuador: Huaponi Ediciones .
Acosta, A., & Martinez, E. (2018). Los Derechos de la Naturaleza como puerta de entrada a otro mundo posible. In D. d. Bologna, Un approccio multidisciplinare (Vol. Prima edizione, pp. 13-46).
Arroyo Leon, F. (2019). Ecuador makes big push into larce-scale mining with Chinese-backed project. Retrieved Agosto 18, 2020, from Agencia EFE: https://www.efe.com/efe/english/business/ecuador-makes-big-push-into-large-scale-mining-with-chinese-backed-project/50000265-4027442
Baldwin, R., & Cave, M. (1999). Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy, and Pratice. (Vol. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/londonschoolecons/detail.action?docID=4963183). Oxford University Press.
Berry, T. (2000). The Great Work: Our Way into the Future (Vol. Reprint edition). Crown Publications.
Betaille, J. (2019). Rights of Nature: Why it Might Not Save the Entire World. Journal for European Environmental &Planning Law, 35-64.
Bovens, M., Hart, P., & Kuipers, S. (2008). The Politics of policy evaluation. Oxford University Press.
Callicott, J. (2002). The Pragmatic Power and Promise of Theoretical Environmental Ethics: Forging a New Discourse. Environmental Values, 3-25.
Caso Río Piatúa, Causa de Selección No. 1754-19-JP (Corte Constitucional del Ecuador 2019).
Cullinan, C. (2011). Wild Law (Vol. 2nd edition). Green Books.
Dryzek, J. (2017). Making Sense of Earth's Politics: A Discourse Approach. Oxford University Press.
Estermann, J. (2006). Filosofía andina: Sabiduría indígena para un mundo nuevo (2da ed. reimpresión. ed.). Instituto Ecuménico Andino de Teología (IESEAT).
Grear, A. (2019). It is wrongheaded to protect nature with human-style rights. Retrieved Julio 21, 2020, from https://aeon.co/ideas/its-wrongheaded-to-protect-nature-with-human-style-rights
Gudynas, E. (2016). Derechos de la Naturaleza. Ética biocéntrica y políticas ambientales. . Ediciones Abya Yala.
Kauffman, C., & Martin, P. (2017). Can Rights of Nature Make Development More Sustainable? Why Some Ecuadorian lawsuits succeed and others fail? World Development, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.11.017, 130-142.
Leopold, A. (1968). A Sand County Almanac and Sketches Here and There (Enlarged edition ed.). U.S.A.: Oxford University Press.
Llasag Fernandez, R. (2011). Derechos de la naturaleza: una mirada desde la filosofía indígena y la Constitución. In D. H. Ministerio de Justicia, Los Derechos de la Naturaleza y la Naturaleza de sus Derechos (Vol. 1ª Edición, pp. 75-94).
Lovelock, J. (2000). Gaia: A new Look at Life on Earth (3rd revised ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Marsh, D., & McConnell, A. (2010). Towards a framework for establishing policy success. Public Administration, 364-583.
Martinez Allier, J., & Roca Jusmet, J. (2016). Economía ecológics y política ambiental (Tercera Edición - Primera reimpresión ed.). Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Mcallister, L. K. (2009). Dimensions of Enforcement Style: Factoring in Regulatory Autonomy and Capacity. Law & Policy., 32(1), 61-78.
Murcia, D. (2009). El Sujeto Naturaleza: Elementos para su comprensión. Retrieved Agosto 18, 2020, from Instituto de Estudios Ecologistas del Tercer Mundo: https://therightsofnature.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/Espanol/Murcia_sujeto_naturaleza_2009.pdf
Newig, J. (2007). Symbolic environmental legislation and societal self-deception. Environmental Politics, 276-296.
Observatorio Jurídico de los Derechos de la Naturaleza - Ecuador. (2018). Retrieved Agosto 12, 2020, from https://www.derechosdelanaturaleza.org.ec/
Peel, J., & Osofsky, H. (2015). Climate change litigation: regulatory pathways to cleaner energy. Cambridge University Press.
Prieto Mendez, J. (2013). Derechos de la naturaleza: fundamento, contenido y exigibilidad jurisdiccional. . Quito: Corte Constitucional del Ecuador.
Río Piatúa, Causa 16281-2019-00422 (Sala Multicompetente de la Corte Provincial de Pastaza septiembre 5, 2019).
Salazar Gómez, L. (2020). Listen to Nature! The impacts and implications of guaranteeing Rights of Nature through a legalistic enforcement style in Ecuador. London: The London School of Economics and Political Sciences & SENESCYT .
Scholz, J. (1984). Cooperation, Deterrence, and the Ecology of Regulatory Enforcement. Law & Society Review, 18(2), 179.
Shimshack, J., & Ward, M. (2005). Regulator reputation, enforcement, and environmental compliance. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 50(3), 519-540.
Smith, W. (2011). Beware the 'rights of nature'. Retrieved from https://dailycaller.com/2011/12/30/beware-the-rights-of-nature/
Taplin, D., & Clark, H. (2012). Theory of Change Basics. a primer on theory of change. (Vol. Acknowledge. Theory of Results).
Valladares, C., & Boelens, R. (2017). Extractivism and the rights of nature: Govermentality, 'convenient communities' and epistemic pacts in Ecuador. Environmental Politica, 26(6), 1015 - 1034.
World Bank. (2018). Systematic Country Diagnostic. Public Disclosure, World Bank Group.
Acosta, A., & Martinez, E. (2018). Los Derechos de la Naturaleza como puerta de entrada a otro mundo posible. In D. d. Bologna, Un approccio multidisciplinare (Vol. Prima edizione, pp. 13-46).
Arroyo Leon, F. (2019). Ecuador makes big push into larce-scale mining with Chinese-backed project. Retrieved Agosto 18, 2020, from Agencia EFE: https://www.efe.com/efe/english/business/ecuador-makes-big-push-into-large-scale-mining-with-chinese-backed-project/50000265-4027442
Baldwin, R., & Cave, M. (1999). Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy, and Pratice. (Vol. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/londonschoolecons/detail.action?docID=4963183). Oxford University Press.
Berry, T. (2000). The Great Work: Our Way into the Future (Vol. Reprint edition). Crown Publications.
Betaille, J. (2019). Rights of Nature: Why it Might Not Save the Entire World. Journal for European Environmental &Planning Law, 35-64.
Bovens, M., Hart, P., & Kuipers, S. (2008). The Politics of policy evaluation. Oxford University Press.
Callicott, J. (2002). The Pragmatic Power and Promise of Theoretical Environmental Ethics: Forging a New Discourse. Environmental Values, 3-25.
Caso Río Piatúa, Causa de Selección No. 1754-19-JP (Corte Constitucional del Ecuador 2019).
Cullinan, C. (2011). Wild Law (Vol. 2nd edition). Green Books.
Dryzek, J. (2017). Making Sense of Earth's Politics: A Discourse Approach. Oxford University Press.
Estermann, J. (2006). Filosofía andina: Sabiduría indígena para un mundo nuevo (2da ed. reimpresión. ed.). Instituto Ecuménico Andino de Teología (IESEAT).
Grear, A. (2019). It is wrongheaded to protect nature with human-style rights. Retrieved Julio 21, 2020, from https://aeon.co/ideas/its-wrongheaded-to-protect-nature-with-human-style-rights
Gudynas, E. (2016). Derechos de la Naturaleza. Ética biocéntrica y políticas ambientales. . Ediciones Abya Yala.
Kauffman, C., & Martin, P. (2017). Can Rights of Nature Make Development More Sustainable? Why Some Ecuadorian lawsuits succeed and others fail? World Development, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.11.017, 130-142.
Leopold, A. (1968). A Sand County Almanac and Sketches Here and There (Enlarged edition ed.). U.S.A.: Oxford University Press.
Llasag Fernandez, R. (2011). Derechos de la naturaleza: una mirada desde la filosofía indígena y la Constitución. In D. H. Ministerio de Justicia, Los Derechos de la Naturaleza y la Naturaleza de sus Derechos (Vol. 1ª Edición, pp. 75-94).
Lovelock, J. (2000). Gaia: A new Look at Life on Earth (3rd revised ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Marsh, D., & McConnell, A. (2010). Towards a framework for establishing policy success. Public Administration, 364-583.
Martinez Allier, J., & Roca Jusmet, J. (2016). Economía ecológics y política ambiental (Tercera Edición - Primera reimpresión ed.). Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Mcallister, L. K. (2009). Dimensions of Enforcement Style: Factoring in Regulatory Autonomy and Capacity. Law & Policy., 32(1), 61-78.
Murcia, D. (2009). El Sujeto Naturaleza: Elementos para su comprensión. Retrieved Agosto 18, 2020, from Instituto de Estudios Ecologistas del Tercer Mundo: https://therightsofnature.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/Espanol/Murcia_sujeto_naturaleza_2009.pdf
Newig, J. (2007). Symbolic environmental legislation and societal self-deception. Environmental Politics, 276-296.
Observatorio Jurídico de los Derechos de la Naturaleza - Ecuador. (2018). Retrieved Agosto 12, 2020, from https://www.derechosdelanaturaleza.org.ec/
Peel, J., & Osofsky, H. (2015). Climate change litigation: regulatory pathways to cleaner energy. Cambridge University Press.
Prieto Mendez, J. (2013). Derechos de la naturaleza: fundamento, contenido y exigibilidad jurisdiccional. . Quito: Corte Constitucional del Ecuador.
Río Piatúa, Causa 16281-2019-00422 (Sala Multicompetente de la Corte Provincial de Pastaza septiembre 5, 2019).
Salazar Gómez, L. (2020). Listen to Nature! The impacts and implications of guaranteeing Rights of Nature through a legalistic enforcement style in Ecuador. London: The London School of Economics and Political Sciences & SENESCYT .
Scholz, J. (1984). Cooperation, Deterrence, and the Ecology of Regulatory Enforcement. Law & Society Review, 18(2), 179.
Shimshack, J., & Ward, M. (2005). Regulator reputation, enforcement, and environmental compliance. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 50(3), 519-540.
Smith, W. (2011). Beware the 'rights of nature'. Retrieved from https://dailycaller.com/2011/12/30/beware-the-rights-of-nature/
Taplin, D., & Clark, H. (2012). Theory of Change Basics. a primer on theory of change. (Vol. Acknowledge. Theory of Results).
Valladares, C., & Boelens, R. (2017). Extractivism and the rights of nature: Govermentality, 'convenient communities' and epistemic pacts in Ecuador. Environmental Politica, 26(6), 1015 - 1034.
World Bank. (2018). Systematic Country Diagnostic. Public Disclosure, World Bank Group.